Topic

VEGETATE. Vitality in Architectural Practice

Theme Editor

Aleksandra Jaeschke

Deadline

January 10, 2027

Issue

16

Abstract

The verb to vegetate carries a peculiar paradox. Derived from the Latin vegetare – to enliven, animate, quicken – it has gradually come to signify passivity, inertia, and doing nothing. This semantic inversion is more than a linguistic curiosity. It reveals a profound shift in how modern culture has come to understand vegetal life and, perhaps, life itself.

Architectural culture has long defined action in opposition to what modern culture dismisses as vegetating. It privileges visible intervention over latent responsiveness, form-making over transformative cultivation, command over attunement, disruptive novelty over meaningful continuity, and mechanical resistance over ecological resilience. In doing so, designers and institutions have often projected that very misunderstanding of passivity onto vegetal life itself. Consequently, when vegetation enters architectural discourse, it usually appears as an aesthetically pleasing – if often unruly – object rather than as a living participant with its own agency and distinctive forms of intelligence. It is treated as material, an ecosystem service, a carbon sink, green infrastructure, or a framing landscape: a resource. Plants are something architectural practices use, not living beings from which they might learn.

download submission   or   download call

An interwoven plant community – rooted yet adapted to the seasonal flood pulse / Una comunità vegetale intrecciata, radicata e tuttavia capace di adattarsi al ritmo stagionale delle piene. © 2025 Aleksandra Jaeschke, Kichwa Añangu territory, Yasuní National Park, Napo Province, Ecuador.

Call for Papers

VEGETATE is animated by the exhilaration of encountering vegetal life as a radical form of alterity. Knowledge of plants has developed over millennia – and continues to be held and renewed – by Indigenous peoples and place-based communities through sustained observation, tending, and cultivation, as well as healing and spiritual practices. In many Indigenous traditions, plants have long been understood as sensing, communicative, and relational beings – but within onto-epistemologies not reducible to the categories of Western science. Western botany, in turn, was shaped by many forms of plant knowledge cultivated by rural communities, herbalists, and monastic orders. At the same time, its development as a modern science was deeply entangled with colonial expeditions and institutions that appropriated Indigenous knowledges while operating within – and contributing to – systems of dispossession and extraction. Contemporary research into plant communication and ecological relations is transforming scientific understanding of plant life, using new instruments and methods to record processes unfolding across temporal and spatial scales not directly accessible to human senses. Plants sense, signal, adapt, and form relations in ways profoundly different from our own. The joy of attending to this still difficult-to-perceive world is itself part of the proposition, and the issue invites contributions that make its richness and strangeness palpable.

The proposition, however, extends beyond a reconsideration of architecture’s relationship with vegetation. The call asks not only how architectural practices might engage with vegetal life, but also what it might mean for architecture itself to vegetate – thereby reclaiming, in the process, the term’s original vitality.

For more: download call